Analysis Report for AUST32 ($14JUL13XA) (Analyzed by David Gordon, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: Warkworth had drive problems; stated late and ended early; only ~8 hrs of usable data. Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 4379 scheduled 4032 correlated (in database) 3699 recoverable (usable) 3643 used Session fit: 41.646 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M 1699 1436 1413 83.2% HOBART12 2099 1883 1845 87.9% KATH12M 2089 1896 1872 89.6% WARK12M 719 227 223 31.0% YARRA12M 2152 1956 1933 89.8% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 4379 3699 3643 83.2% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0332-403 91 85 85 93.4% 0637-752 130 121 104 80.0% 0119+115 44 38 36 81.8% 2232-488 136 104 91 66.9% 2355-106 49 49 47 95.9% 0202-172 45 45 43 95.6% 2355-534 115 91 91 79.1% 0727-115 83 71 70 84.3% 0552+398 13 13 13 100.0% OJ287 19 19 17 89.5% 3C454.3 53 41 41 77.4% 0400+258 22 22 14 63.6% 0308-611 106 106 103 97.2% 0516-621 166 150 126 75.9% 2326-477 72 72 69 95.8% 0220-349 58 58 50 86.2% 2142-758 235 181 174 74.0% 0454-463 91 91 89 97.8% 0426-380 112 101 77 68.8% 0202+319 18 18 18 100.0% 2255-282 22 22 22 100.0% CTA26 14 14 11 78.6% 0319+121 19 19 19 100.0% 1124-186 30 30 29 96.7% 0537-441 120 110 94 78.3% 0454-234 90 84 63 70.0% 0420-014 47 45 33 70.2% 0521-365 78 77 61 78.2% NRAO190 39 39 28 71.8% 1144-379 90 90 90 100.0% 1038+064 11 11 10 90.9% 0738+313 13 13 12 92.3% 0657+172 24 24 21 87.5% 4C39.25 12 12 10 83.3% 0607-157 57 57 55 96.5% 1610-771 16 16 16 100.0% 3C274 13 13 11 84.6% 0648-165 54 54 53 98.1% 0454-810 238 194 161 67.6% 1424-418 153 141 137 89.5% 1334-127 86 86 82 95.3% 0826-373 79 79 76 96.2% 1128+385 11 11 11 100.0% 0723-008 34 34 22 64.7% 0834-201 76 76 47 61.8% 0748+126 25 25 23 92.0% 1308+326 19 19 18 94.7% 1548+056 42 42 38 90.5% 0754+100 13 13 11 84.6% 1510-089 71 71 69 97.2% 1657-261 102 81 56 54.9% 1519-273 34 34 34 100.0% 1749+096 54 54 54 100.0% 1611+343 23 23 21 91.3% NRAO530 71 61 55 77.5% 1741-038 70 70 67 95.7% 1921-293 65 56 53 81.5% 1954-388 69 69 69 100.0% 1633+38 25 25 24 96.0% 1958-179 66 66 66 100.0% 1908-201 11 11 10 90.9% 2052-474 18 18 18 100.0% 1751+288 16 16 16 100.0% 1057-797 9 9 9 100.0% 2149-306 64 64 60 93.8% 2131-021 68 50 43 63.2% 1622-297 84 67 59 70.2% 2136+141 28 28 23 82.1% 2145+067 21 21 21 100.0% CTA102 50 35 35 70.0% 3C446 51 51 45 88.2% 2201+315 16 16 16 100.0% 0106+013 32 32 31 96.9% 2227-088 42 42 42 100.0% 2216-038 36 36 25 69.4% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 4379 4032 3643 83.2% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M-HOBART12 507 452 441 87.0% HART15M-KATH12M 486 436 432 88.9% HART15M-WARK12M 146 34 33 22.6% HART15M-YARRA12M 560 514 507 90.5% HOBART12-KATH12M 703 691 676 96.2% HOBART12-WARK12M 193 66 65 33.7% HOBART12-YARRA12M 696 674 663 95.3% KATH12M-WARK12M 192 64 63 32.8% KATH12M-YARRA12M 708 705 701 99.0% WARK12M-YARRA12M 188 63 62 33.0% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 4379 3699 3643 83.2% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.